Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Gujarat
  4. /
  5. 2012
  6. /
  7. January

Narshibhai vs State

High Court Of Gujarat|09 February, 2012

JUDGMENT / ORDER

[1] The present application is filed seeking to release the applicants on anticipatory bail as they are apprehending their arrest in connection with C.R.No.I-08 of 2012 registered with Lakhtar Police Station, District - Surendranagar.
[2] Heard learned Senior advocate for the applicant.
[3] This Court has gone through the complaint. Considering the allegations made in the complaint and role attributed to the applicants, without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the applicants. This Court has also taken into consideration the law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra & Ors. Reported in [2011]1 SCC 694, wherein the Apex Court reiterated the law laid down by the Constitutional Bench in the case of Shri Gurubaksh Singh Sibbia & Ors. Reported in [1980]2 SCC 565.
[4] In the event of arrest of the applicants in connection with C.R.No.I-08 of 2012 registered with Lakhtar Police Station, District - Surendranagar for the offences alleged against them, the applicants shall be released on bail on each executing a bond of Rs.10,000/- [Rupees ten thousand only] with one surety of the like amount on the following conditions that they shall:
co-operate with the investigation and make themselves available whenever required;
remain present before the concerned Police Station on 14th February, 2012 between 11.00 a.m. to 2.00 p.m..;
not hamper the investigation in any manner nor shall directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any witness so as to dissuade them for disclosing such facts to the Court or to any Police Officer;
at the time of execution of bond, shall furnish address to the Investigating Officer and the Court concerned and shall not change residence till the final disposal of the case or till further orders;
not leave India without the permission of the Court and, if holding Passport, surrender the same before the trial Court immediately;
[5] It would be open to the Investigating Officer to file an application for remand if he considers it proper and just; and the competent Court would decide it on merits.
[6] At the trial, the Trial Court shall not be influenced by the observations made by this Court while enlarging the applicant on bail.
[7] Rule made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is permitted.
[M.D.Shah, J.] satish Top
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Narshibhai vs State

Court

High Court Of Gujarat

JudgmentDate
09 February, 2012