Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Narendra Yadav vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|19 December, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 90
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 42245 of 2019 Petitioner :- Narendra Yadav Respondent :- State Of U P And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Chandrika Prasad Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned standing counsel for State - respondents.
The sole prayer made by the petitioner in the instant writ petition is for expeditious disposal of his application dated 01.11.2018 pending before the respondent no. 2.
To the said prayer, learned standing counsel has no objection.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits of the case, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent no. 2 to decide the petitioner's application dated 01.11.2018, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably, within a period of three months from the date of presentation of a certified copy of this order, if there is no legal impediment.
It is made clear that the Court has not adjudicated the claim of the petitioner on merits.
Order Date :- 19.12.2019 Amit Mishra
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Narendra Yadav vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
19 December, 2019
Judges
  • Piyush Agrawal
Advocates
  • Chandrika Prasad Shukla