Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Narendra Patel vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|27 February, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 70
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1043 of 2017 Revisionist :- Narendra Patel Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Siddharth Niranjan,Prabhat Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Fakhruzzaman,Shams Uz Zaman
Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the revisionist, learned A.G.A. and learned counsel for the opposite party no.2.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the revisionist that the present revision has become infructuous with the lapse of time and it may be dismissed as infructuous.
Learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 does not dispute the aforesaid fact.
Accordingly, the revision is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 27.2.2019 AKT
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Narendra Patel vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
27 February, 2019
Judges
  • Sanjay Kumar Singh
Advocates
  • Siddharth Niranjan Prabhat Kumar