Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Narayan@ Ramnarayan Gaud And Others vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|17 September, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 64
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 33398 of 2021 Applicant :- Narayan@ Ramnarayan Gaud And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Rajeev Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Sweety Srivastava
Hon'ble Ajit Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the entire record.
The present bail application has been filed by the applicants in Case Crime No. 130 of 2021 under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 304 IPC, Police Station - Pipraich, District - Gorakhpur with the prayer to enlarge them on bail.
At the very outset it is submitted that it is a case of parity.
The contention as raised at the Bar by learned counsel for the applicants is that applicants are quite innocent and have been falsely implicated in the present case. It is argued that the applicant No. 1 is the husband of co- accused Badami Devi, who has already been granted bail and applicant Nos. 2 and 3 are daughters-in-law. It is submitted that the applicants deserves bail on the ground of parity with co-accused Badami Devi as the role assigned to the present applicants is similar to the role assigned to co- accused Badami Devi, who has already been granted bail by this Court and a copy of her bail order is annexed as Annexure - SA 6 to the supplementary affidavit. Lastly, it is argued that the applicants are in jail since and that in case they are enlarged on bail, they will not misuse the liberty of bail.
Ms. Sweety Srivastava, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant as well as learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail. But he accepts the bail parity of the present applicants with co-accused.
Keeping in view the submission of learned counsel for the parties, period of detention of the applicants and all the attending facts and circumstances of the case, and considering the fact of this case that the case of the applicants is of parity and considering that the applicant No. 1 is aged person and applicants No. 2 and 3 are ladies, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, at this stage, prima facie, a case for bail has been made out.
The prayer for bail is granted. The application is allowed.
Let applicants Narayan@ Ramnarayan Gaud, Smt. Manju Devi and Smt. Ranju Devi involved in the aforesaid crime be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two local sureties to the satisfaction of court concerned subject to the following conditions:-
(1). The applicants shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence and the witnesses are present in Court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law;
(2). The applicants shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through their counsel. In case of their absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against them under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code;
(3). In case, the applicants misuse the liberty of bail and in order to secure their presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicants fail to appear before the Court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court may initiate proceedings against them, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.
(4). The applicants shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court default of this condition is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of their bail and proceed against them in accordance with law.
The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad, self attested by the learned counsel for the applicant alongwith a self attested identity proof of the said persons (preferably Aadhar Card) mentioning the mobile number (s) to which the said Aadhar Card is linked before the concerned Court/Authority/Official.
The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.
Order Date :- 17.9.2021 LBY
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Narayan@ Ramnarayan Gaud And Others vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
17 September, 2021
Judges
  • Ajit Singh
Advocates
  • Rajeev Kumar Singh