Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. This application has been filed with a prayer to quash the chargesheet in case crime No. 410 of 2009 under sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 504, 506, 120-B I.P.C., P.S. Kasna , District Gautam Budh Nagar. From the perusal of the record, it appears that on the basis of material collected by the I.O., the prima facie offence is made out. Therefore, there is no irregularity or illegality in filing the charge-sheet, the prayer for quashing the charge-sheet is refused.
However, considering the facts, it is directed that in case applicant appears before the court concerned within 30 days from today and applies for bail, the same shall be heard and disposed of in view of Smt. Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P. 2005 Cr.L.J. 755. The Full Bench of this court has held in the aforementioned case;
1. Even if a cognizable offence is disclosed in the FIR or complaint the arrest of the accused is not a must, rather the police officer should be guided by the the decision of the Supreme Court in Joginder Kumar Vs. State of U.P. 1994 Cr.L.J. 1981, before deciding whether to make an arrest or not.
2. The High Court should ordinarily not direct any Subordinate Court to decide the bail application the same day, as that would be interfering with the judicial discretion of the court hearing the bail application. However, as stated above, when the bail application is under section 437 Cr.P.C. ordinarily the Magistrate should himself decide the bail application the same day, and if he decides in a rare and exceptional case not to decide it on the same day, he must record his reasons in writing. As regards the application under section 439 Cr.P.C. it is in the discretion of the learned Sessions Judge, considering the facts and circumstances whether to decide the bail application the same day or not, and it is also in his discretion to grant interim bail the same day subject to the final decision on the bail application later.
The above view has been approved by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Versus State of U.P. on 23.3.2009 in Criminal Appeal No. 538 of 2009.
Thereafter, it is directed that in case the applicant moves discharge application at appropriate stage or raises objection at the time of framing the charge, the same shall be heard and disposed of in accordance with law.
With this direction, this application is finally disposed. Order Date :- 13.1.2010 Su