Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Narasimhaiah And Others vs The State Of Karnataka And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|27 August, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.VEERAPPA W.P.Nos.17426-17428/2015(GM-RES) BETWEEN 1. NARASIMHAIAH S/O LATE JULAPPA, AGED ABOTU 60 YEARS, R/O LAKSHMINAGARA POST, SIRA TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT-572137 2. T GOVINDAPPA S/O THIMMANNA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/O LAKSHMINAGARA POST, SIRA TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT-572137 3. MAHANTHESHA B S/O LATE BALA RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/O LAKSHMINAGARA POST, SIRA TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT 572137 ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI GOWTHAMDEV C ULLAL, ADVOCATE) AND 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FISHERIES VIKASA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560001 2. THE DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF FISHERIES, PODIUM BLOCK, V V TOWERS, DR AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560001 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF FISHERIES DEPARTMENT OF FISHERIES, 6TH FLOOR, MAHAVEER COMPLEX, KEMPEGOWDA ROAD, BANGALORE-560009 4. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF FISHERIES GRADE-2, DEPARTMENT OF FISHERIES, SIRA-572 137 TUMKUR DISTRICT 5. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER MINOR IRRIGATION SUB DIVISION SHIRA, TUMKUR DISTRICT -572 137.
6. SIRA TALUKU MAHILA MEENUGARIKE, KERE ABHIVRUDDHI SANGHA (R) PANJIGANAHALLI VILLAGE, SIRA TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT REP BY ITS PRESIDENT SMT P RAMADEVI AGE 50 YEARS, W/O N DAYANANDA SAGAR, R/AT PANJIGANAHALLI VILLAGE, LAKSHMISAGARA POST, SIRA TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT – 572 137. ... RESPONDENTS (BY MS.NILOUFER AKBAR, AGA FOR R1 TO R5, SRI MOHAMED RIZWAN AHAMED, ADVOCATE FOR R6) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED.15.4.2015 PASSED BY R-3 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.
THESE PETITIONS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners Sri.Gowthamdev C Ullal submits that in view of the subsequent developments, prayer sought for by the petitioners does not survive for consideration.
Accordingly, the writ petitions are dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/- JUDGE rs
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Narasimhaiah And Others vs The State Of Karnataka And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
27 August, 2019
Judges
  • B Veerappa