IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF MARCH 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NO.54167 OF 2013 (GM-RES) BETWEEN:
NARASIMHA PAI S/O LATE VASUDEVA PAI AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS R/O NO.305, ANDES 14TH BLOCK, HERITAGE ESTATE YELAHANKA, BANGALORE.
(BY MRS.SANDHYA.U.PRABHU, ADV.) AND:
UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO MINISTRY OF NEW AND RENEWABLE ENERGY NO.14, CGO COMPLEX, LODHI ROAD NEW DELHI – 110 011.
… PETITIONER THROUGH THE ADDL.SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE.
… RESPONDENT (BY MR.KALYAN BASAVARAJ, ADV.) - - -
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO RELEASE THE SUBSIDY DUE TO THE PETITIONER SINCE PAST 1-1/2 YEARS BY CONSIDERING ANN-M AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER Mr.Sandhya U Prabhu, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Mr.Kalyan Basavaraj, learned counsel for the respondent.
2. The writ petition is admitted for hearing.
With consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the same is heard finally.
3. In this petition, the petitioner has sought for a direction to respondent to release the subsidy due to the petitioner since past 1 ½ years by considering the representation contained in Annexure-M.
4. When the matter was taken up today, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the representation submitted by him shall be considered. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondent submitted that the same shall be dealt with in accordance with law if not already decided.
4. In view of the submissions made and in the facts of the case, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the competent authority to decide the representation submitted by the petitioner, if not already decided in accordance with law by a speaking order within four months from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order passed today. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits.
Accordingly, the petition is disposed of.
Sd/- JUDGE SS