IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL No.7927 OF 2017 (ISA) BETWEEN:
Narasimha Murthy, S/o. Late Chikkamariyappa, Aged about 70 years, R/at Somashettyhalli Village, Chikkabanavara Post, Yeshwanthapura Hobli, Bengaluru North Taluk, Bengaluru-560090.
(By Sri. M.R.Shalamala, Advocate - Absent) AND:
1. Gowramma, W/o. Sri. Shantharajaiah, D/o. Chikkamariyappa, Aged about 67 years, R/at No.690, 7th Cross, 3rd Block, BEL Layout, Vidhyaranyapura, Bengaluru-560097.
2. Mariyappa, S/o. Late Chikkamariyappa, Aged about 77 years, R/at Somashettyhalli Village, …Appellant Chikkabanavara Post, Yeshwanthapura Hobli, Bengaluru North Taluk, Bengaluru-560090.
3. Narasimhaiah, S/o. Chikkamariyappa, Unmarried, other LRs are Already on record R/at Somashettyhalli Village, Chikkabanavara Post, Yeshwanthapura Hobli, Bengaluru North Taluk, Bengaluru-560090.
4. Smt. Mallamma, W/o. Sri. S.Basavaraju, D/o. Chikkamariyappa, Aged about 55 years, R/at No.1290, Dhanalakshimi Layout, Vidhyaranyapura, Bengaluru-560097.
5. Sri. Narasimhaiah, S/o. Late Chikkamariyappa, Unmarried and other LRs Are already on record.
6. Sri. Shivanna, S/o. Late Chikkamariyappa, Aged about 52 years, Escort Employee, R/at Abbigere Village, Chikkabanavara Post, Yeshwanthapura Hobli, Bengaluru North Taluk-560090.
7. Smt. Lakshmamma, D/o. Late Chikkamariyappa, W/o. Nanjappa, Aged about 72 years, R/at Kesthure Village (Dinne), Kesthure Post, Kora Hobli-572128, Tumkur District.
8. Sri. Shankaraiah, S/o. Late Chikkamariyappa, R/at Somashettyhalli Village, Aged about 58 years, Chikkabanavara Post, Yeshwanthapura Hobli, Bengaluru North Taluk-560090.
... Respondents This MFA is filed under Section 384 of the Indian Succession Act, against the order dated 29.06.2016 passed in P & SC No.147/2010 on the file of the V Additional City Civil Judge, Bengaluru (CCH-13), allowing petition filed under Section 383 of Indian Succession Act.
This MFA coming on for orders this day, the Court made the following:
ORDER The appellants’ counsel is absent. Order dated 25.04.2019 shows that two weeks time was granted for compliance of office objections. It was made clear that if the office objections are not complied within the time, the appeal shall be listed for dismissal. Office objections have remained without being complied with. Therefore appeal is dismissed.
SD/- JUDGE KMV/-