Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Nanna vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|27 July, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 77
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 16132 of 2021 Applicant :- Nanna Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Vikrant Gupta,Krishna Kant Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Anil Kumar Ojha,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
This bail application under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed by the applicant Nanna seeking enlargement on bail during trial in connection with Case Crime No. 07 of 2021, under Section 3/5/8 of U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, registered at P.S.- Shahzad Nagar, District- Rampur.
Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. According to prosecution case, 70 kg. beef was recovered from the possession of applicant but at the time of recovery, no public witness was available. Recovery is false and planted by the police. Except this, no any other case is pending against him. In case he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in trial. It is further submitted that the co-accused Bhoora has been granted bail by co-ordinate bench of this Court in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 9889 of 2021 vide order dated 12.02.2021. It is further submitted that the applicant is languishing in jail since 15.02.2021.
Per contra, learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the prayer for bail but did not dispute the facts as raised by the learned counsel for the applicant.
Nature of accusation, evidence collected by I.O. in support of the charge, gravity of offence, nature and severity of punishment, complicity of the accused in case of conviction and all other attending circumstances were duly considered.
Considering the rival submissions of learned counsel for the parties, keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, particularly the fact that the co-accused Bhoora has been granted bail by co-ordinate bench of this Court, without commenting any opinion on merits of the case, a case for bail is made out.
Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.
Let the applicant Nanna involved in the aforesaid case crime, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions;
1. The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence or threaten the witnesses.
2. The applicant shall co-operate with the trial and shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for charge, evidence when the witnesses are present in the court, statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. and argument.
3. During trial, he shall not indulge in any criminal activities.
In breach of any condition enumerated above, Trial Court shall be at liberty to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.
The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad.
The computer generated copy of such order shall be self attested by the counsel of the party concerned.
The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.
Order Date :- 27.7.2021 VPS
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Nanna vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
27 July, 2021
Judges
  • Anil Kumar Ojha
Advocates
  • Vikrant Gupta Krishna Kant Yadav