Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Nanjunda vs Lakshmamma W/O Manjunath And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|14 December, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2017 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR R.F.A. No.889/2015 BETWEEN :
NANJUNDA S/O MARIAPPA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/AT PREMISES IN OLD DOOR NO.164/174 NEW NO.12, PRESENT NO.51, 7TH CROSS, AZADNAGAR MYSORE ROAD, CHAMARAJPET, BANGALORE-560018. ...APPELLANT (BY SRI N.SURESHA, ADV. – ABSENT.) AND :
1. LAKSHMAMMA W/O MANJUNATH, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, PRESENTLY RESIDING IN PREMISES NO.52, 3RD CORSS, GANESH TEMPLE ROAD, MAGADI ROAD, CHOLARAPALYA, NEAR SHANTHALA THEATRE, BANGALORE-560040.
2. NANJAMMA W/O NANJAPPA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS RESIDING IN PREMISES IN NO.191 (EARLIER NO.206) 6TH CROSS, AZADNAGAR CHAMARAJPET, BANGALORE-560018.
- 2 -
3. JAYAMMA W/O NANJAPPA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS RESIDING IN PREMISES IN NO.191 (EARLIER NO.206) 6TH CROSS, AZADNAGAR CHAMARAJPET BANGALORE-560018. …RESPONDENTS THIS R.F.A. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 25.04.2015 PASSED IN O.S NO.1082/09 ON THE FILE OF THE XLIII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, CCH-44, BENGALURU, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR PARTITION AND MESNE PROFIT.
THIS R.F.A. COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER Appellant’s counsel is absent.
For the reason that the appellant’s counsel has failed to comply the office objections, appeal is dismissed for default.
Sd/- JUDGE AN/-
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Nanjunda vs Lakshmamma W/O Manjunath And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
14 December, 2017
Judges
  • Sreenivas Harish Kumar