IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 01ST DAY OF APRIL 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NOs.34091 OF 2017 AND 34092 OF 2017 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN:
1. SMT NANJAMMA W/O LATE VENKATASWAMY REDDY, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO 31, 3RD A CROSS, 8TH MAIN ROAD, T C PLAYA, HOYSALA NAGAR, RAMAMURTHYNAGAR BENGALURU – 560016.
2. SRI SRIDHAR S/O LATE VENKATASWAMY REDDY, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO 31, 3RD A CROSS, 8TH MAIN ROAD, T C PLAYA, HOYSALA NAGAR, RAMAMURTHYNAGAR BENGALURU – 560016. (By MR. G G SHASTRI, ADV.) AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY ITS SECRETARY TO HOME DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA VEEDHI, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU – 560001.
… PETITIONERS 2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE DODDABANASAWADI POLICE STATION , DODDBANASAWADI, BENGALURU – 560043.
3. SMT RATHNAMMA W/O LATE PAPAIAH REDDY, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/AT NO.71, OLD POST OFFICE RAOD, DODDBANASAWADI, BENGALURU – 560043.
4. SRI MANJUNATH S/O LATE PAPAIAH REDDY, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/AT NO.71, OLD POST OFFICE RAOD, DODDBANASAWADI BENGALURU – 560043.
(By MR. VIJAYKUMAR A PATIL, AGA FOR R-1 & 2 MR. G MANIVANNAN, ADV. FOR R3 & 4) - - -
… RESPONDENTS THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-2 TO TAKE IMMEDIATE ACTION ON THE POLICE COMPLIANTS ISSUED THROUGH THE ADVOCATE OF THE PETITIONERS SENT ON 30.6.2017 AT ANNEX-B [WRONGLY DATED AS 30.7.2017) AND ALSO TAKE IMMEDIATE ACTION ON THE REMINDER COMPLAINT DTD.17.7.2017 AT ANNEX-D SENT THROUGH THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONERS TO THE R-2 AND ETC., THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER Sri.G.G.Shastri, learned counsel for the petitioners.
Sri.Vijay Kumar A.Patil, learned Additional Government Advocate for the respondent Nos.1 and 2.
Sri.G.Manivannan, learned counsel for the respondent Nos.3 and 4.
2. The petitions are admitted for hearing. With consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the same are heard finally.
3. After arguing the matter to some extent, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the petitions with liberty to file appropriate application before the Trial Court.
4. In view of the aforesaid submissions, the petitions are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioners to file appropriate application before the Trial Court. Needless to state that in case the petitioners file such an application before the Trial Court, the same shall be decided by a speaking order in accordance with law after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners within four months from the date of filing such application.
Sd/- JUDGE RV