IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K.NATARAJAN REGULAR SECOND APPEAL No.9 of 2012 (INJ) BETWEEN JAYAMMA, W/O. PUTTASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/AT D.No.622, SWARNASANDRA COLONY, MANDYA – 574 402.
...APPELLANT [BY SMT. B.P. RENUKAMBA, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)] AND 1. NANJAMMA ALIAS SATHAMMA, W/O. LINGEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/AT BUGATHAHALLI VILLAGE, BANNUR HOBLI – 571 101.
T. NARASIPURA TALUK, MYSORE DISTRICT.
2. MARIGOWDA, S/O CHIKKADEVEGOWDANA SUBBEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS, 3. M. NAGARAJU, S/O MARIGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, RESPONDENT Nos.2 AND 3 ARE RESIDING AT:
DESHAVALLI VILLAGE, KIRUGAVAL HOBLI, MALAVALLI TALUK – 571 424, MANDYA DISTRICT.
… RESPONDENTS (BY SRI G.S. BHAT, ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3; VAKALATH NOT FILED FOR R2;
NOTICE TO R1 IS DISPENSED WITH VIDE COURT ORDER DATED 14.02.2012.) THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 17.10.2011 PASSED IN R.A.No.49 of 2007 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., MALAVALLI, ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 12.10.2007 PASSED IN O.S.No.175 of 2003 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN) MALAVALLI.
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER Learned counsel for the appellant remained absent in the morning session as well as during post-lunch session.
Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- JUDGE mv