1. Today at the outset learned advocate for the petitioner submitted that against the order passed by the Court in petition preferred by him on behalf of his client, Letters Patent Appeal is preferred challenging the order declining any interim relief on the ground, inter alia, that the larger public interest would prevail over individual interest.
2. Learned advocate for the petitioner admitted that any order of injunction / stay has not been granted by the Division Bench, and the hearing of the matter is scheduled to take place on 12.7.2012.
3. While making submissions with regard to the relief prayed for in present petition, after having made submission to some extent, learned advocate for the petitioner realized that the petition requires substantive amendment inasmuch as relevant details as to whether notification is issued by the government or not and other relevant details so as to support and justify the relief prayed for in present petition have not been incorporated in the petition. Learned advocate for the petitioner therefore, requested for time.
4. The request as prayed for is accepted. The hearing of the petition is adjourned, at the request by learned advocate for the petitioner, to 16.7.2012.
Since 11.6.2012 it is the learned Counsel for the petitioner who is seeking time for one reason or another as a result of which hearing of the petition has not taken place. Therefore, question of granting any ad-interim or interim relief at this stage does not arise. The said issue will be considered after petitioner makes submission in light of the petition.
(K.M.THAKER,J.) Suresh* Top