IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF MAY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. VEERAPPA WRIT PETITION No.20359 OF 2019 (EDN-RES.) BETWEEN:
Mr. Nandikotkur Hussain Shahul Hameed, S/o. Dr. P. Hussain Saheb, Age: 23 years, Reg. No.13M2587, R/o H.No.1-5-44, New Town, Mahabubnagar, Telangana – 509 001. ...Petitioner (By Sri. Abhishek Malipatil, Advocate) AND:
1. Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, 4th ‘T’ Block, Jayanagar, Bengaluru – 560 041.
Rep. by its Vice-Chancellor.
2. The Registrar (Evaluation), Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, 4th ‘T’ Block, Jayanagar, Bengaluru – 560 070. ... Respondents (By Sri. N.K. Ramesh, Advocate) This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to direct the respondent Nos.1 and 2 to conduct 3rd evaluation of the answer scripts of the O.B.G. Paper I of the Phase III Part 1 MBBS Course Examinations of December 2018 undertaken by the petitioner since the difference of marks between the evaluators is more than 15% in terms of the order dated 21.12.2018 passed by this Hon’ble Court in W.P.No.48194-48198/2018 and connected Writ Petitions vide Annexure – E.
This Writ petition coming on for Preliminary Hearing this day, the Court made the following:
O R D E R Petitioner has sought for the following relief: “Issue a writ or order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents No.1 and 2 to conduct 3rd evaluation of the answer scripts of the O.B.G. Paper I of the Phase III Part 1 MBBS Course Examinations of December 2018 undertaken by the petitioner since the difference of marks between the evaluators is more than 15% in terms of the order dated 21.12.2018 passed by this Hon’ble Court in W.P.No.48194-48198/2018 and connected petitions vide Annexure – E.”
2. Sri. Abhishek Malipatil, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner contended that the issue raised in the present writ petition is already considered and disposed of by this Court in W.P.Nos.48194- 48198/2018 and connected matters on 21.12.2018.
3. The same is not disputed by Sri. N.K. Ramesh, learned counsel appearing for the respondents.
4. In view of the above, writ petition is disposed of in the same terms imposed by this court in the aforesaid writ petitions.
Sd/- JUDGE SV/-