Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Naipal vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|13 August, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 10
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 19809 of 2021 Petitioner :- Naipal Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Madhuker Kushwaha,Akhilesh Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Vijay Kumar Dixit
Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State and also perused the records.
Grievance of the petitioner is that the Declaratory Suit being Case No.39 of 2011 (Naipal Vs. State of U.P. and Another), under Section 229-B of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950, was not being decided. A prayer, therefore, has been made for a direction to decide the aforesaid suit expeditiously.
Learned Standing Counsel states that all endeavour shall be made to decide the aforesaid suit.
Without entering into the merits of the case, it is being directed that the Declaratory Suit being Case No.39 of 2011 (Naipal Vs. State of U.P. and Another), under Section 229-B of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950, be decided unless there is any legal impediment, within a period of one year from the date of presentation of a copy of this order. The copy of this order would be duly certified by the petitioner's counsel.
With the aforesaid observations/directions, the writ petition is disposed of.
Order Date :- 13.8.2021 Siddhant
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Naipal vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
13 August, 2021
Judges
  • Siddhartha Varma
Advocates
  • Madhuker Kushwaha Akhilesh Singh