Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Telangana
  4. /
  5. 2014
  6. /
  7. January

Nagaram Raju And Others vs Syndicate Bank Regional Office And Others

High Court Of Telangana|18 July, 2014
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO WRIT PETITION No.20247 of 2014 Between:-
Nagaram Raju and others And …Petitioners Syndicate Bank Regional Office (Rural) Hyderabad, H.No.6-2-915, West Block, 2nd Floor, Hyderabad Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Board, Khairatabad, Hyderabad, Telangana State, Rep.by its Dy.General Manager/Chief Manager and others.
…Respondents.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO WRIT PETITION No.20247 of 2014 ORDER:
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader for Labour appearing for the respondents.
The first respondent bank made a requisition to the respondents 2 and 3 to sponsor the candidates belonging t o OC, BC, SC and ST community for the posts of temporary Attenders. The grievance of the petitioners is that the respondents have not been receiving the applications from the candidates other than those sponsored by the Employment Exchange.
The present writ petition is therefore filed to direct the respondents to receive the applications from the petitioners for the posts of temporary Attenders without insisting upon their names being sponsored by the Employment Exchange.
Reliance is placed by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners on EXCISE SUPERINTENDENT MALKAPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTDRICT, A.P., Vs.
[1]
K.B.N. VISWESHWARA RAO AND OTHERS , wherein, the Supreme Court has laid down categorically that restricting the selection only to the candidates sponsored by employment exchange is not proper. In addition to requisitioning the names from employment exchange, names should also be called for by publication in newspapers, having wide circulation and display on office notice boards or announcement on radio, television and employment news bulletins.
In view of the above Judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court, the respondents are under obligation to receive the application from the petitioners.
Therefore, the respondents are directed to receive the applications from the petitioners and allow them to participate in the selection process including the written test and interviews to the existing vacancies of temporary Attender posts without insisting that their names must be sponsored by the Employment Exchange.
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. The Miscellaneous Petitions pending if any shall stand closed.
R.KANTHA RAO,J Date: 18-07-2014 Shr.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO WRIT PETITION No.20247 of 2014 Date:18-07-2014 Shr.
[1] (1996) 6 Supreme Court Cases 216
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Nagaram Raju And Others vs Syndicate Bank Regional Office And Others

Court

High Court Of Telangana

JudgmentDate
18 July, 2014
Judges
  • R Kantha Rao