IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.1233/2016 (DEC/INJ) BETWEEN:
1. NAGARAJ S/O LATE PUTTABYRAPPA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS OCC: AGRICULTURE 2. GANGAPPA S/O LATE PUTTABYRAPPA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS OCC: AGRICULTURE 3. BYREGOWDA S/O LATE PUTTABYRAPPA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS OCC: AGRICULTURE 4. HANUMAIAH S/O LATE PUTTABYRAPPA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS 5. HANUMANTHARAYAPPA S/O LATE PUTTABYRAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS OCC: AGRICULTURE 6. LAKSHMAMMA D/O LATE PUTTABYRAPPA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS OCC: AGRICULTURE 7. JAYAMMA D/O LATE PUTTABYRAPPA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS OCC: AGRICULTURE ALL ARE R/AT ARISINAKUNTE KASABA HOBLI, NALAMANGALA TALUK BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT – 562 123 ASWATHAPPA SINCE DEAD BY HIS LR’S 8. JAYARAMU S/O LATE ASWATHAPPA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS 9. NARAYANAPPA S/O LATE ASWATHAPPA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS APPELLANTS 8 AND 9 ARE R/O ARISHINAKUTE, NELAMANGALA TALUK BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT – 562 123 …APPELLANTS (BY SRI K.B.LOKANATH, ADV.) AND:
SMT.LAKKAMMA SINCE DEAD BY HER LR’S 1. RAMAKRISHNAPPA S/O LATE NAGAPPA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS 2. NARAYANAPPA S/O LATE NAGAPPA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS RESPONDENTS NO.1 AND 2 ARE R/AT ARISHINAKUNTE VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK – 562 123 3. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE – 560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY 4. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT T.V.TOWER BUILDING DR.AMBEDKAR ROAD BANGALORE – 560 001 5. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER DODDABALLAPURA SUB-DIVISION T.V.TOWER BUILDING DR.AMBEDKAR ROAD BANGALORE – 560 001 6. THE DEPUTY TAHASILDAR NELAMANGALA TALUK – 562 123 BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT 7. THE HEAD MASTER GOVERNMENT HIGHER PRIMARY SCHOOL ARISHINAKUNTE, KASABA HOBLI NELAMANGALA TALUK – 562 123 BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT 8. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE – 560 001 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI MANJUNATH M.HEGDE, ADV. FOR SRI T.SESHAGIRI RAO, ADV. FOR R1 AND R2; SRI S.B.SHAHAPUR, HCGP FOR R3-R8) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED:12.08.2015 PASSED IN R.A.NO.24/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. DISTRICT JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU, DISMISSING THE APPEAL FILED AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 05.10.2013 PASSED IN O.S.NO.186/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NELAMANGALA.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T Learned Counsel for the appellants submits that the memo for withdrawal of the appeal is filed under his signature and he represents all the appellants.
2. Since the Advocate on record for the appellants has filed memo for withdrawal, office objection on memo is over-ruled. The appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
In view of disposal of the appeal, I.A.Nos.1/2016 to 3/2016 do not survive for consideration and disposed of accordingly.
Sd/- JUDGE KNM/-