IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019 BEFORE The Hon’ble Mr.Justice B.M.Shyam Prasad Regular Second Appeal No. 898 OF 2017 Between:
NAGAPPA REDDY AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, SON OF ANGADI NARASIMHA REDDY RESIDING AT TIRUPALYA JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TAUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT.
(BY SRI. MANIVANNAN G., ADVOCATE) And:
DODDANARASAPPA REDDY AGED ABOUT 89 YEARS, SON OF DODDANARASIMHA REDDY RESIDING AT TIRUPALYA JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT SINCE DECEASED BY LRS 1. SMT NARASAMMA ... APPELLANT DAUGHTER OF LATE DODDNARASAPPA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS.
2. SRI GOVINDA REDDY AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, SON OF LATE DODDANARASAPPA REDDY.
3. SRI KRISHNA REDDY AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, SON OF LATE DODDANARASAPPA REDDY.
4. SRI KODANDARAMA REDDY AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, SON OF LATE DODDANARASAPPA REDDY.
5. SRI MAHADEVA REDDY AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, SON OF LATE DODDANARASAPPA REDDY.
6. SRI NARASIMHA REDDY AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, SON OF LATE DODDANARASAPPA REDDY.
7. SMT NEELAMMA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, DAUGHTER OF LATE DODDANARASAPPA REDDY.
RESPONDENTS 1 TO 7 ARE RESIDING AT THIRUPALYA VILLAGE JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK.
... RESPONDENTS THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 ORDER XLII RULE 1 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 30.01.2017 PASSED IN RA NO. 65/2006 (OLD NO. 227/2004) ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, ANEKAL DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 01.07.2004 PASSED IN OS NO. 357/96 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. CVIL JUDGE (JR.DN) JMFC, ANEKAL.
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Judgment This Court on 30.08.2019 had adjourned the appeal granting three weeks time for compliance with the office objections subject to the condition that the appeal would be listed for dismissal if there is failure to comply with the office objections. Despite this preemptory order, the office objections have not been complied with. It is obvious that the concerned is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for default.
Sd/- Judge SA Ct:sr