Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Nafees Ahmad vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|31 May, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 35
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 20447 of 2018 Petitioner :- Nafees Ahmad Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Saiyad Iqbal Ahmed Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pranjal Mehrotra Hon'ble Bharati Sapru,J. Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J.
The instructions have come from the department. It appears that the landlord of the petitioner is objecting to the grant of a new connection in favour of the petitioner as the parties are litigating.
Sri Pranjal Mehrotra, learned Counsel for the respondent-department says that subject to the provision of an indemnity bond by the petitioner his case for a new connections will be considered.
In view of the above, the petitioner may supply an indemnity bond to the petitioner and in case, he does so, the department will then consider his case for grant of a new connection. This may be done within the next 15 days.
With the above observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. No costs.
Order Date :- 31.5.2018 S.P.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Nafees Ahmad vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
31 May, 2018
Judges
  • Bharati Sapru
Advocates
  • Saiyad Iqbal Ahmed