Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2010
  6. /
  7. January

Nadir Hussain vs State Of U.P. And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|21 June, 2010

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Hon'ble Rajesh Chandra,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Smt. Chhaya Gupta, Advocate on behalf of the respondent.
The petitioner has admittedly taken loan for the commercial purpose. He has committed default in repayment of loan amount. Loan agreement has not been brought on record.
Counsel for the respondent points out that there is an arbitration clause in the loan agreement executed for the purpose. In view of the aforesaid, no interference under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is warranted.
Writ petition is dismissed. Petitioner may seek his remedy in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 21.6.2010 Pkb/
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Nadir Hussain vs State Of U.P. And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
21 June, 2010

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.