Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Nadeem vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|26 February, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 34
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 39085 of 2014 Applicant :- Nadeem Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Jitendra Singh,A.K. Singh,Brijesh Sahai,Zia Naz Zaidi Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,Vijay Shantam
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. This is a bail application pending since 2014. Called in revise. None appeared to press it. Learned A.G.A. is present for State and Sri Viay Shantam, Advocate is present for Informant. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record.
2. It appears that either trial has concluded or applicant has lost interest for any other reason and that's why none is present to press it. Therefore, by efflux of time, this application has rendered infructuous.
3. Dismissed accordingly.
Order Date :- 26.2.2019 AK
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Nadeem vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
26 February, 2019
Judges
  • Sudhir Agarwal
Advocates
  • Jitendra Singh A K Singh Brijesh Sahai Zia Naz Zaidi