Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Nadeem Qurishi And Another vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|19 December, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 65
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 56726 of 2019 Applicant :- Nadeem Qurishi And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Abdul Mazeed Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.
Supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of applicant, is taken on record.
Heard Sri Abdul Mazeed, learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State.
Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants have been falsely implicated in the present case on account of local enmity. There is no independent witness of the alleged incident. It is further submitted that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the applicants and a false recovery has been shown from the possession of the applicants, which is planted. There are no reported criminal antecedents against the applicants. The applicants are in jail since 22.11.2019.
Keeping in view the nature of submissions advanced, the applicants are entitled for bail.
Let, the applicants- Nadeem Qurishi and Waseem Qurishi involved in Case Crime No. 274 of 2019, under Section 3/5/8 Cow Slaughter Act, Police Station Amariya, District- Pilibhit be enlarged on bail on their executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties (Rs. Two Lacs each) (One should be of a family member) each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, with the following conditions:-
(i) The applicants shall file an undertaking to the effect that they shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.
(ii) The applicants shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through their counsel. In case of their absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against them under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.
(iii) In case, the applicants misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure their presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicants fail to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against them, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.
(iv) The applicants shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicants is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against them in accordance with law.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail.
Order Date :- 19.12.2019 Arti
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Nadeem Qurishi And Another vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
19 December, 2019
Judges
  • Vivek Kumar Singh
Advocates
  • Abdul Mazeed