IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.K. SUDHINDRARAO R.F.A.No.1655/2005 BETWEEN:
N VEERASWAMY SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRs.
a. SMT. V PATTAMMAL W/O N VEERASWAMY AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS.
b. SRI V RAVICHANDRAN S/O N VEERASWAMY AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS.
c. SRI V BALAJI S/O N VEERASWAMY AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS.
ALL ARE RESIDING AT No.1008, 80 FT.ROAD 4TH BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR BANGALORE – 560 010.
...APPELLANTS (M/S. JAYARAJ & ASSOCIATES, ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND:
1. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORTIY, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER SANKEY ROAD 2 BANGALORE – 560 001.
2. THE CHAKRAVARTHI HOUSE BUILDING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD., No.20, SHOPPING STREET BANGALORE – 560 020.
... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI I G GACHCHINAMATH, ADVOCATE FOR R0-1 APPEAL AGAINST R-2 DISMISSED V/O DTD.26.07.12) THIS RFA IS FILED U/S 96 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 16.7.2005 PASSED IN O.S.No.6115/1988 ON THE FILE OF THE 1ST ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE (CCH.No.2) DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR DECLARATION.
THIS RFA COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT Learned counsel for appellants absent. Called for the second time. No representation. Matter is of the year 2005 in terms of the present appeal and of the year 1988 in terms of the original suit and listed for Hearing. It appears that appellants are not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- JUDGE tsn*