IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU ON THE 30TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. M. SHYAM PRASAD MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.1176 OF 2015 (FC) BETWEEN:
N. SAMPATHU PARTY-IN-PERSON SON OF LATE SRI. NATARAJAN AGED 53 YEARS A-205, "A" BLOOK SANGEETHA APARTMENT 5TH CROSS MALLESARAM, BENGALURU - 560 003.
PH: 9448076665 (NO.43, NETHRAVATI STREET, 5TH CROSS CHANDRA LAYOUT, BENGALURU – 72.
... APPELLANT (BY SRI. N. SAMPATHU, PARTY-IN-PERSON - ABSENT) AND:
SMT. PADMINI SAMPATHU WIFE OF N. SAMPATHU AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS NO.2711, 11TH MAIN, "D" BLOOK RAJAJINAGAR II STAGE, BENGALURU - 560 010.
... RESPONDENT THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(1) OF THE FAMILY COURTS ACT 1984 AND HINDU MARRIAGE ACT 1985 UNDER SECTION 28 READ WITH 151 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE III ADDITIONAL FAMILY JUDGE, BENGALURU IN O.S. NO.135 OF 2006 DATED 2ND OF DECEMBER 2014 AND ETC.
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, RAVI MALIMATH J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT On 14.01.2019, the party-in-person was absent. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed today. Even today, he is not present.
2. A memo dated 28.01.2019, is filed indicating various facts to keep the case pending for various reasons. On considering the said memo, we do not find it appropriate to keep this case pending only because the party-in-person wants it. Therefore, we find no good ground to proceed further in the matter. Hence, the appeal is dismissed.
SD/- SD/-
JUDGE JUDGE SA Ct:sr