Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

N Sadiq Ahmed vs H M Raghavendra And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|11 October, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.M.SHYAM PRASAD REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 835 OF 2018 BETWEEN:
N. SADIQ AHMED SON OF NAZEER AHAMED, AGED ABOUOT 36 YEARS RESIDENT OF S.N. NAGAR, 4TH CROSS, SAGAR TOWN - 577 401, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT.
(BY SRI. S. V. PRAKASH., ADVOCATE) AND:
1. H. M. RAGHAVENDRA SON OF H. M. MANJUNATHAPPA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS RESIDENT OF NEW B.H. ROAD NEAR KRISHNA GARAGE, SAGAR TOWN - 577 401. SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT.
2. MOHAMMED ISMAIL SON OF MOHAMMED HAYATH, RESIDENT OF S.N.CIRCLE, SAGAR TOWN - 577 401 SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT.
... APPELLANT ... RESPONDENTS THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 23.02.2018 PASSED IN RA.NO.41/2017, ON THE FILE OF THE PRL.SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., SAGAR, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE ORDER DATED 29.07.2017 PASSED ON IA NO.2 IN EX.NO.2/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., SAGAR DISMISSING THE IA NO.2 FILED UNDER ORDER XXI RULE 97AND 103 OF CPC.
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Judgment The learned counsel for the appellant files a memo seeking dismissal of the appeal on the ground that the appeal is rendered infructuous.
The memo is accepted. The appeal is dismissed as having rendered infructuous.
SD/- JUDGE nv Ct:sr
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

N Sadiq Ahmed vs H M Raghavendra And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
11 October, 2019
Judges
  • B M Shyam Prasad