IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JULY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NO.14929 OF 2019 (LA-KIADB) BETWEEN:
Smt.N.Padma D/o Narayanappa, Aged about 43 years, R/at No.266, 15th Cross, Basavanapura Main Road, Gayithri Layout, K.R.Puram, Bengaluru – 36.
... Petitioner (By Sri.Hanumantharaya D, Adv.) AND:
1. The State of Karnataka, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Medium and Large Scale Industry Department, Vikasa Soudha, Dr.B.R.Ambedkar Veedhi, Bengaluru – 560 001.
2. The Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board, Represented by its Managing Director, Nrupathunga Road, Bengaluru – 560 001.
3. The Special Land Acquisition Officer, The Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board, Represented by its Managing Director, Nrupathunga Road, Bengaluru – 560 001.
... Respondents (By Sri.E.S.Indiresh, AGA for R1;
Sri.H.L.Pradeep Kumar, Adv. for R2 and R3) This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to direct the respondent authorities to consider the representation of the writ petition dated 03.08.2018 respect of schedule property vide Annexure-F and etc.
This Writ Petition coming on for Preliminary Hearing, this day, the Court made the following:-
ORDER Sri.Hanumantharaya.D, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Sri.E.S.Indiresh, learned Additional Government Advocate for respondent No.1.
Sri.H.L.Pradeep Kumar, learned counsel for respondent Nos.2 and 3.
The petition is admitted for hearing. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the same is heard finally.
2. In this petition, the petitioner seeks for a direction to the respondent authorities to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 03.08.2018 vide Annexure-F.
3. When the matter was taken up today, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the writ petition be disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.3 to consider and decide the representation submitted by the petitioner in accordance with law.
4. On the other hand, learned counsel for respondent Nos.2 and 3 submitted that the representation submitted by the petitioner shall be dealt with in accordance with law.
5. In view of the submissions made and in the facts of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction that respondent Nos.3 shall consider and decide the representation submitted by the petitioner in accordance with law by a speaking order within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order passed today.
6. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case.
Accordingly, the petition is disposed of.
Sd/- JUDGE dn/-