Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

N Murali And Others vs State Rep By The Inspector Of Police Vigilance And Anti Corruption City Special Unit Ii Chennai ( Crime No 2/Ac/1988/Hq )

Madras High Court|21 September, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 21.09.2017 CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN
Crl.OP.No.19935 of 2017 & Crl.MP.No.12020 of 2017
1. N.Murali
2. R.Kannnan
3. R.S.Moorthy
4. K.Krishnan Kutty @ Kutty @ Elamaran
5. Mani @ Nedumaran .. Petitioners Vs.
State rep. by The Inspector of Police Vigilance and Anti Corruption City Special Unit II Chennai.
(Crime No.2/AC/1988/HQ) .. Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to call for the records relating to the case in C.C.No.55 of 2011 on the file of Special Court for cases under the Prevention of Corruption Act, Chennai and quash the same in so far as the petitioners are concern.
For Petitioners : Mr.K.Varadha Kamaraj For Respondent : Mr.R.Ravichandran Government Advocate (Crl. Side)
ORDER
It is a case against the petitioners for alleged offences under Sections 120 (B), r/w 167, 409, 420, 465, 467, 471 r/w 467 and 465, 218 and 161 of IPC, and Section 5(2) r/w 5(1)(c) & (d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 and Section 109 of IPC.
2. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that due to intermittent delay in filing of final report, this Court has quashed the case against some of the co-accused. Hence, it may be extended to the petitioners herein also.
3. Whereas, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) submits that though for some of the co-accused, this Court has quashed the case on the ground of intermittent delay, the State has preferred an appeal in so far as the other accused/ the petitioners herein are concerned.
4. Considering the order passed by the earlier Judges, since the latest order of this Court, dismissing the quash petition, I have no hesitation to follow the latest Judgment of my predecessor. Hence, the Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. Consequently connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Index:Yes/No 21.09.2017 jer To
1. The Inspector of Police Vigilance and Anti Corruption City Special Unit II Chennai.
2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.
DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN.J,
jer
Crl.OP.No.19935 of 2017 & Crl.MP.No.12020 of 2017
21.09.2017
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

N Murali And Others vs State Rep By The Inspector Of Police Vigilance And Anti Corruption City Special Unit Ii Chennai ( Crime No 2/Ac/1988/Hq )

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
21 September, 2017
Judges
  • G Jayachandran