Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Telangana
  4. /
  5. 2014
  6. /
  7. January

Smt N Mangamma vs The Govt Of A P

High Court Of Telangana|20 November, 2014
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.14351 of 2013 Dated:20.11.2014 Between:
Smt N.Mangamma, W/o Apparao ….Petitioner And:
The Govt of A.P., reptd by its Principal Secretary, Agriculture and Co-Operation (Marketing.II) Department, Hyderabad and three others.
… Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri Rama Rao Immaneni Counsel for the Respondents: A.G.P. for Agriculture (Andhra Pradesh) The court made the following:
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed for the following substantive relief:
“to issue a writ, order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondents in forcibly trying to evict the petitioner from Stall No.10 situated in Rythu Bazar, Swaraj maidan, Vijayawada, pending consideration of her application for renewal of lease by adopting coercive measures, without following due process of law and without even issuing notice, as illegal and arbitrary and consequently, to direct the respondent not to take any coercive measures without following due process of law.”
At the hearing, it is not disputed by learned counsel for both the parties that the issue similar to that raised in this Writ Petition, viz., extension of allotment period of stall in Rythu Bazaar beyond three years, was decided by this Court, vide Writ Petition No.33549 of 2014, dated 10.11.2014.
For the same reasons as contained in the aforesaid order, this Writ Petition is dismissed with the direction that the reasons contained therein shall form part of this order. However, this order will not preclude the Joint Collectors in the State to consider Letter No.RBZ/934/2013, dated 29.11.2013, of the Chief Executive Officer, Rythu Bazaars, Hyderabad and extend the term of the petitioner at his discretion. For a period of two weeks, the petitioner shall not be evicted from the stall allotted to her to enable her to make representation to the competent authority.
As a sequel, interim order, dated 09.05.2013, is vacated and WPMP.No.17480 of 2013 is dismissed as infructuous.
C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J
20th November, 2014 DR
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Smt N Mangamma vs The Govt Of A P

Court

High Court Of Telangana

JudgmentDate
20 November, 2014
Judges
  • C V Nagarjuna Reddy
Advocates
  • Sri Rama Rao Immaneni