Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8449 of 2003 Petitioner :- Nand Keshwar Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others Counsel for Petitioner :- M.P. Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ranjan Srivastava
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Called in revise. None appeared to press the writ petition. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record.
2. By means of present writ petition, petitioner has sought following reliefs:
"(i) a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned termination order dated 28.1.2003 to the writ petition passed by the respondent No. 2.
(ii) a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent No. 2 to reinstate the petitioner in service and to pay wages continuously and to stay the operation of the impugned termination order dated 28.1.2003 during the pendency of the writ petition before this Hon'ble Court. "
3. I myself have gone through the pleadings, grounds as also reliefs sought and find that petitioner is not able to make out a case so as to justify interference of this Court by granting relief as prayed for.
4. Moreover, it appears that either the cause of action no more survives or the petitioner has lost interest in this matter or it has otherwise become infructuous and probably for this reason, none is interested to have decided this matter on merits and that is why, counsel for petitioner is absent.
5. Dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 26.4.2018 Ravi Prakash