IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF APRIL, 2015 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE B. SREENIVASE GOWDA REVIEW PETITION NO. 914 OF 2012 BETWEEN THE UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER SOUTH CENTRAL RAILWAY RAIL NILAYAM SECUNDERABAD 780 072 ... PETITIONER (BY SRI. N.S. SANJAY GOWDA., ADV.,) AND 1. SMT. N.B. ANNAPURNA WIFE OF LATE NB VENKOBANNA SHETTY 52 YEARS 2. SRI N.B. SURESH SON OF LATE NB VENKOBANNA SHETTY 52 YEARS 3. SRI. N.B. SUNIL SON OF LATE NB VENKOBANNA SHETTY 52 YEARS R1 TO R3 ARE ALL RESIDING AT H NO.135-A, NEAR BUS STAND SANDUR, SANDUR TALUK BELLARY DISTRICT 765 201 ... RESPONDENTS (R1 TO R3 SERVED UNREPRESENTED) * * * THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER 47 RULE 1 OF CPC, PRAYING TO REVIEW THE ORDER DATED 29.07.2009 PASSED IN MFA NO.11432/2008 (RCT), ON THE FILE OF THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE..
THIS R P COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER As there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on 08. 01. 2015, the petition was ordered to be listed next week as to why the petition should not be dismissed for non-prosecution.
Today also there is no representation for the petitioner.
Hence, petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
SD/- JUDGE HR