Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

M.Victoria Mary vs The State Of Tamil Nadu

Madras High Court|10 March, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the order of transfer which is impugned in this Writ Petition has already been withdrawn. Hence, the prayer in the Writ Petition has become infructuous.
2.Recording the said submission, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
To
1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Secretary to Government, School Education Department, Fort St.George, Chennai ? 9
2.The Director of Elementary Education, College Road, Chennai.
3.The District Elementary Educational Officer, O/o. The District Elementary Educational Office, Dindigul District, Dindigul.
4.The Additional Assistant Elementary Educational Officer, O/o. Assistant Elementary Educational Office, Thoppampatti, Dindigul District..
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

M.Victoria Mary vs The State Of Tamil Nadu

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
10 March, 2017