Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Muzammil vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|21 December, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 5
Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 5073 of 2018 Petitioner :- Muzammil Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Santosh Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Vikram Nath,J. Hon'ble Dr. Y.K. Srivastava,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Rajiv Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
The remedy available to the petitioner for removal of encroachment is either under the Municipal Corporation Act, 1959 or by way of filing a Civil Suit and not by way of approaching this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
We accordingly dismiss this petition as withdrawn leaving it open to the petitioner to avail such remedy as advised.
Order Date :- 21.12.2018 Arnima (Dr. Y.K. Srivastava, J.) (Vikram Nath, J.)
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Muzammil vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
21 December, 2018
Judges
  • Vikram Nath
Advocates
  • Santosh Kumar Tiwari