[Order of the Court was made by M.VENUGOPAL, J.] Today, a memo dated 01.09.2017 is filed on behalf of the Petitioners. A cursory perusal of the contents of the Memo latently and patently indicates that the Petitioners are seeking permission of this Court to file a Review Petition as against the Order dated 03.06.2013 in ORA/247/2010/TM/CH passed by the 3rd Respondent / Intellectual Property Appellate Board, Chennai. For granting permission to the Petitioners in this regard, the 1st Respondent's Learned Counsel has no objection in the subject matter in issue.
2. Taking note of the fact that Rule 23 of Intellectual Property Appellate Board (Procedure) Rules, 2003 enjoins the filing of Review Petition as against the Order of an Appellate Board / 3rd Respondent, in the instant case, this Court grants permission to the Petitioners accordingly to file a Review Petition before the 3rd Respondent / Intellectual Property Appellate Board, Chennai in regard to the Impugned Order in ORA/247/2010/TM/CH dated 03.06.2013 within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. This Court grants only two weeks time to the Petitioners to file a Review Petition because of the reason that the Rule 23 of Intellectual Property Appellate Board, (Procedure) Rules, 2003 contemplates filing of an Review Petition within a period of two months from the date of Order being passed by the Appellate Board.
3. In as much as this Court has granted permission to the Petitioners to file a Review Petition as against the Order dated 03.06.2013 in ORA/247/2010/TM/CH seeking rectification of the Trade Marks Register, this Court directs the 3rd Respondent / Registrar, Intellectual Property Appellate Board, Chennai not to insist upon the point of limitation for filing Review Petition, provided the Petitioners files the Review Petition in question, within a period of two weeks from the date of passing of this Order. If such a Review Petition is filed before the 3rd Respondent, it is open to the respective parties to raise all factual and legal pleas before the 3rd Respondent and to seek redressal of their grievances in the manner known to Law and in accordance with Law.
With the aforesaid observations and directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.