Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Musran vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 July, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 51
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 18749 of 2019 Applicant :- Musran Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Mirza Ali Zulfaqar,Kameshwar Singh,Krishna Kant Shukla,Mohammad Alam Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Ashutosh
Hon'ble Om Prakash-VII,J.
Heard Sushri Swati Agarwal Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. He has not committed the present offence. Informant is not eye account witness. Referring to the statement of eye account witnesses Mohd. Mustafa and Jan-e-Aalam, it is further submitted that they also reached at the place of occurrence at the time of offence but no specific role was assigned against the applicant. It is further submitted that witnesses reached on the spot had seen both the accused beating the deceased. It is further submitted that role assigned to the present applicant is not distinguishable with the role of co- accused. Trial is still pending. The applicant has no criminal history. He is languishing in jail since 25.01.2019 and in case he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in trial.
On the other hand, learned AGA opposed the prayer for bail.
Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, complicity of accused, scrutinizing the facts mentioned in the F.I.R., statement of witnesses recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C. and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.
Let the applicant Musran involved in Case Crime No. 20 of 2019, under Sections 304, 504 IPC, P.S. Shahzad Nagar, District - Rampur be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two heavy sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions.
1. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.
2. The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness.
3. The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted.
4. The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected.
5. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move bail cancellation application before this Court.
The party shall file computer generated copy of this order downloaded from the official website of High Court, Allahabad. The concerned Court / Authority / Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.
Order Date :- 30.7.2021 Sanjeet
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Musran vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 July, 2021
Judges
  • Om Prakash Vii
Advocates
  • Mirza Ali Zulfaqar Kameshwar Singh Krishna Kant Shukla Mohammad Alam