IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 61151 OF 2016 (GM-FC) BETWEEN:
MR. MUSHTAQ NAYAK S/O N. GHOUSE KHAN AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/O D.NO.15/A, 3RD CROSS ADARSHANAGAR, R.T. NAGAR POST BANGALORE-560032 ... PETITIONER (BY SMT. BUDRAUUNISA, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. V. VISHWANATHA SHETTY, ADVOCATE) AND:
DR. SALMA PARVEEN M.R. DIRECTOR COMPANY NO.09324079 REEHANA CONSULTANCY LIMITED #17, ROSENEATH CLOSE VOLVERHAMPTON UNITED KINGDOM WVA6DY DR. SALMA PARVEEN NO.4/A, NEAR MUKHERJI NAGAR COMMERCIAL COMPLEX DELHI DR. SALMA PARVEEN M.R. D/O MOHAMMED MUNEER AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS RESIDENT OF DOOR NO.6000 1ST STAGE, RAJEEV NAGAR MYSORE-570019 REPRESENTED BY HER SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER AND HER FATHER MOHAMMED MUNEER S/O LATE MOHAMMED DASTAGIR AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS RESIDENT OF DOOR NO.600 1ST STAGE, RAJEEVNAGAR MYSORE-570019 ... RESPONDENT (BY SRI. MOHAMMED MUNEER, ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 28.10.2016 PASSED BY THE HON’BLE JUDGE, ADDITIONAL FAMILY COURT AT MYSURU IN C.. MIS.NO.172/2014 VIDE ANNEXURE-G AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER Learned counsel for the respondent files a memo stating that the present petition arises out of the order dated 28.10.2016 passed in C.Mis. No.172/2014 by the Additional Family Court, Mysore and that the said C.Mis. No.172/2014 has been disposed of on 27.01.2017. Hence, the present petition does not survive. Learned counsel therefore submits that the petition may be dismissed as infructuous.
Memo is taken on record.
It is noticed that registry has also put up a note stating that C.Mis.172/2014 has been disposed of on 27.01.2017.
In view of the memo and the office note, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/- JUDGE ln