Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Murugesan vs The Commissioner And Others

Madras High Court|23 November, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

When the matter was called on 21.11.2017, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, this Court has posted the matter under the caption “For dismissal” on 23.11.2017. But, even today when the matter was called, there is no representation for the petitioner.
2. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for default. No costs.
23.11.2017 Index : yes/No Internet : Yes gsk To
1. The Commissioner, Panchayat Union Office, Mangalore, Tittakudi Taluk, Cuddalore District.
2. The President, Panchayat Union, E.Keeranur, http://www.judis.nic.in Tittakudi, Cuddalore District.
W.P.No.40226 of 2006
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Murugesan vs The Commissioner And Others

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
23 November, 2017
Judges
  • V Parthiban

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.