It is seen that this petitioner gave a complaint, based on which, a petition enquiry in CSR No.159/2015, was conducted and pursuant to the order dated 01.10.2015 passed by this Court in Crl.O.P.No.18967/2015, the Sub Inspector of Police, Sernthamaram Police Station has closed the complaint given by the petitioner by the impugned order. Challenging which, this writ petition has been filed.
2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondents.
3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the impugned order has been passed by the Sub Inspector of Police without even properly conducting enquiry with the petitioner.
4.In the considered opinion of this Court, the impugned order dated 18.02.2016 passed by the Sub Inspector of Police is not an order spico censo, but it is only a communication to the petitioner giving reasons as to why he is not proceeding further with the enquiry in CSR No.159/2015. In other words, for closing CSR No.159/2015, the Sub Inspector of Police, has given reasons in the communication dated 18.02.2016 that has been sent to the petitioner. The said communication is not judicially reviewable, it will also not have any effect in any civil proceedings that may be instituted by the petitioner.
5. In the result, this petition is dismissed as devoid of merits. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
To
1.The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli.
2.The Sub-Inspector of Police, Sernthamaram Police Station, Sernthamaram, Tirunelveli District..