Heard Mr.S.Muthukrishnan, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.Pala Ramasamy, the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondent.
2. This writ petition has been filed praying for a writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to take appropriate action against the 3rd respondent for the violation of the town planning rules, in the construction of the apartments, on the basis of the petitioner's representation, dated 25.10.2009.
3. Though the prayer sought for by the petitioner, in the present writ petition, is for a larger relief, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had submitted that it would suffice, if the petitioner is permitted to make a representation to the first respondent, with regard to the reliefs sought for in the writ petition and if the first respondent is directed to dispose of the said representation, on merits and in accordance with law, within a specified period.
4. The learned Special Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents has no objection for this Court passing such an order.
5. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing on either side, the petitioner is permitted to make a representation to the first respondent, within fifteen days from today and on receipt of such representation, the first respondent is directed to dispose of the same, on merits and in accordance with law, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, as well as to the other parties concerned, within a period of twelve weeks, thereafter.
6. With the above directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also closed.
cs To
1.The Trichirappalli City Corporation, Rep. by its Commissioner, Trichirappalli City Corporation, Trichy.
2.The Assistant Director, Trichirappalli City Planning Project, Trichirappalli City Corporation, Trichirappalli.