Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Murari vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|27 February, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 39
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7831 of 2018 Petitioner :- Murari Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 16 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rakesh Singh,Ashutosh Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Dilip Gupta,J. Hon'ble Jayant Banerji,J.
The petition is absolutely vague. It does not disclose whether an award has been made under Section 3-G (1) of the National Highways Act, 1956 nor does it disclose whether compensation was paid to the private respondents. Even the National Highways Authority of India has not been impleaded as a party.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has, therefore, stated that the writ petition may be dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition with better particulars and after impleading the National Highways Authority of India.
The writ petition, is, accordingly, dismissed with the liberty aforesaid.
Order Date :- 27.2.2018 A. V. Singh (Dilip Gupta,J.) (Jayant Banerji,J.)
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Murari vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
27 February, 2018
Judges
  • Dilip Gupta
Advocates
  • Rakesh Singh Ashutosh Kumar Singh