Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Murali vs The Secretary To The Government And Others

Madras High Court|13 March, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED 13.03.2017 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU and THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH H.C.P No.1892of 2016 Murali .. Petitioner Vs
1. The Secretary to the Government, Home Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009.
2. The Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai Police. .. Respondents Habeas Corpus Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus of any other writ of direction to call records relating to the detention order in Memo No.750/BCDFGISSSV/2016 dated 20.07.2016 passed by the respondent 20.07.2016 under the Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 and set asided the same and direct the respondent to produce the petitioner's son in law VETRIVEL S/o. VADIVEL @ BOXER VADIVEL, aged about 28 years the detenu, now confied in Central Prison, puzhal, Chennai before this Court and set the petitioner's son in law VETRIVEL S/o VADIVEL @ BOXER VADIVEL aged about 28 years the detenu herein at liberty and pass such order.
For Petitoner : Mr.S.Senthilvel For respondents : Mr.V.M.R. Rajendran Addl. Public Prosecutor ORDER (Order of the Court was made by S. NAGAMUTHU,J.,) The petitioner, who is the Uncle of the detenu VETRIVEL S/o. Vadivel @ Boxer Vadivel aged 28 years, has come forward with this petition challenging the detention order passed by the second respondent dated 20.07.2016 against the son in law branding him as a "Goonda" under the Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Drug Offenders, Forest Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders, Sand Offenders, Slum Grabbers and Video Pirates Act, 1982 [Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982].
2. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the order of detention passed by the second respondent as against the son in law of the petitioner dated 20.07.2016 has been revoked by the Government in G.O. [Rt] No.4168 Home, Prohibition & Excise [X] Department dated 01.09.2016 and he has also produced a copy of the said order.
3. Recording the submission of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, this petition is closed as the same has become infructuous.
(S.N.J.,) (A.S.M.J.,) Speaking/Non speaking 13.03.2017 Index : Yes/no Internet : Yes/no sr/sji To
1. The Secretary to the Government, Home Prohibition And Excise Department , Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009.
2. The Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai Police.
3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Chennai.
S.NAGAMUTHU,J.
And
ANITA SUMANTH,J.,
sr/sji Order in H.C.P.No.1892of 2016 13-03-2017 http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Murali vs The Secretary To The Government And Others

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
13 March, 2017
Judges
  • S Nagamuthu
  • Anita Sumanth