Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Muqeem And Another vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 April, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 60
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 15791 of 2018 Applicant :- Muqeem And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Shabeena Begum,Ashiyam Nasir Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ravindra Nath Kakkar,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
The present bail application has been filed for enlarging the applicants on bail in case Crime No. 112 of 2018, under Section 3 (1) U. P. Gangster and Ante Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, PS- Azim Nagar, District- Rampur.
Learned counsel for the applicants submits that applicants have been falsely implicated in this case. It is next contended that as per gang chart one case alleged to have shown against the applicants being Case Crime No. 517 of 2017, under Section 3/5/8 Cow Slaughter Act & 3/11 Animal Cruelty Act and in the aforesaid case applicants have been granted bail, copy of the bail orders are annexed as Annexure-3 to the affidavit accompanying the bail applications. It is next contended that there is also no possibility of his either fleeing away from the judicial process or tampering with the witnesses and they are in jail since 21.03.2018. Hence the applicant should be released on bail.
Learned A.G.A. has, however, opposed the prayer for bail to the applicants but admitted the fact that applicants have been granted bail in the aforementioned cases shown against them in the gang chart.
Keeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence, complicity of the accused, severity of punishment, submission of the learned counsel for the parties and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, I am of the view that the applicants have made out a case for bail.
Let applicants Muqeem and Moumin be released on bail in the aforesaid case crime number on their furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the following conditions:-
(i) The applicants shall not indulge in any criminal activity.
(ii) The applicants shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence.
(iii) The applicants shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses.
(iv) The applicants shall regularly appear on the dates fixed by the trial court unless his personal attendance is exempted by the trial court.
In case of default of any of the conditions enumerated above, it will be open to the opposite parties to approach the Court for cancellation of bail.
Order Date :- 30.4.2018 AKT
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Muqeem And Another vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 April, 2018
Judges
  • Ravindra Nath Kakkar
Advocates
  • Shabeena Begum Ashiyam Nasir