1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Munne vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|29 April, 2019


Court No. - 78
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 17619 of 2019 Applicant :- Munne Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Vikrant Gupta,Dharmendra Singhal Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.
Heard Sri Vikrant Gupta, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Om Prakash Mishra, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record of the present bail application.
The present bail application has been filed by the applicant – Munne with a prayer to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No.176 of 2019, under Sections 308, 323, 504 I.P.C., Police Station Shahbad, District Rampur.
It is argued by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. It is argued that general role of causing injury to the injured is assigned to all the accused and no specific role has been assigned to the applicant. Criminal history of the applicant is explained in para 10 of the affidavit filed in support of the bail application. It is next contended that there is no possibility of fleeing away from the judicial process or tampering with the witnesses and in case, the applicant is enlarged on bail, the applicant shall not misuse the liberty of bail and the applicant is languishing in jail since 28.03.2019. Accordingly, he requests for bail.
Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the applicant but could not dispute the aforesaid facts as argued by the learned counsel for the applicant.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh vs. State of U.P. and another, reported in (2018) 3 SCC 22, without expressing any opinion on merit of the case, let the applicant involved in aforesaid case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two local sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the following conditions:-
(i) The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity.
(ii) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence.
(iii) The applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses.
(iv) The applicant shall regularly appear on the dates fixed by the trial court unless his personal attendance is exempted by the trial court.
In case of default of any of the conditions enumerated above, it will be open to the opposite parties to approach the Court for cancellation of bail.
Order Date :- 29.4.2019 Anand Sri./-
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.

Munne vs State Of U P


High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

29 April, 2019
  • S Manju Rani Chauhan
  • Vikrant Gupta Dharmendra Singhal