IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO.41860/2014 (SC/ST) Between:
1. Munishami @ Munishamaiah S/o. Late Muniyappa Since deceased – by his LR Smt.Venkatamma D/o. Late Munishami W/o. Muniyappa, Aged about 60 years, Sriramanahalli Village, Hesaraghatta Hobli, Bengaluru North (Addl.) Taluk, Bengaluru Urban District.
PIN – 560 089.
And also at:
Smt. Venkatamma W/o. Muniyappa, R/at. Bettenehalli, Hegganahalli Post, Kundana Hobli, Devanahalli Taluk, Bengaluru Rural District.
PIN – 562 110.
2) Venkatesh S/o. Late Munishami @ Muniswamaiah, Sriramanahalli, Hesaraghatta Hobli, Bengaluru North (Adl.) Taluk, Now it is Yelahanka Taluk. … Petitioners (By Sri. Munegowda A., Advocate) And:
1. The State of Karnataka, Rep. by its Secretary, Department of Revenue, Multistoried Building, Bengaluru – 560 001.
2. The Special Deputy Commissioner, Bengaluru Urban District, K.G.Road, Bengaluru – 560 001.
3. The Assistant Commissioner, Bengaluru North Sub-Division, Revenue Bhavan, K.G.Road, Bengaluru – 560 001.
4. R. Ranganath S/o. Late C. Rangaiah Major in age, R/at. Yalanadu, Hiriyur Taluk, Chitradurga District, PIN – 577 598.
Since deceased represented by his LR’s 4(a) Smt. Geetha @ Geethamma W/o. Late Ranganath, Aged 62 years.
4(b) Sri. R.Ashwath S/o. Late R.Ranganath, Aged about 42 years.
4(c) Sri. R.Srinath S/o. Late R.Ranganath, Aged about 38 years.
All R/at. Yalanadu, Yalanadu Post, Hiriyur Taluk, Chithradurga District, PIN – 577 598. …Respondents ( By Smt. Savithramma, HCGP for R1 to R3; Sri. T. Umashankar, Adv. for R4(a) to R4(c) ) This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the order dated 25.10.2001 passed by the respondent-3 vide Annexure ‘E’ and order dated 21.07.2010 passed by the respondent-2 vide Annexure ‘F’ and etc., This Writ Petition coming on for Orders this day, the Court made the following:
ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo seeking for withdrawal of the writ petition and there is a thumb impression of the petitioners.
2. Memo is placed on record.
3. In light of the said memo, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/-
JUDGE KG/-