Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Munish And Others vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 March, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 1
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7936 of 2018 Petitioner :- Munish And 04 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 02 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Arvind Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Krishna Pratap Singh,J.
Sri Omvir Singh Rajpoot, Advocate, has filed his Vakalatnama on behalf of respondent no.3 today in Court, which is taken on record.
Heard Sri Arvind Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Omvir Singh Rajpoot, learned counsel for the 3, Sri Vikas Sahai, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the impugned FIR as well as material brought on record.
This petition has been filed by the petitioners with a prayer to quash the FIR dated 10.3.2018 registered as Case Crime No.100 of 2018, under Sections 363, 366 I.P.C. and Section 4 of POCSO Act, Police Station Bagwala, District Etah.
Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the kidnapped girl shall be produced before the court concerned, it is directed that in case the alleged kidnapped girl Km. Sukrita appears/produced before the court of learned C.J.M. concerned within 20 days from today and moves an application for her medical examination, recording her statement under section 161 Cr.P.C. and 164 Cr.P.C, the learned Magistrate concerned shall fix a date for the same purpose, on that date the first informant & officer in charge of the police station concerned shall be summoned, she shall be produced before C.M.O. concerned by the concerned police officer for her medical examination thereafter she shall be produced before CJM concerned for recording her statement under section 164 Cr.P.C. the same shall be recorded on the application filed by the I.O./Officer in charge of the police station concerned, till then no coercive step shall be taken against the petitioners, in default of it, it shall be opened to the police authority concerned to arrest the petitioners, if she is found major and does not support the FIR version, the petitioners shall not be arrested till submission of the police report under section 173(2) Cr.P.C. but the petitioners shall co- operate with the investigation. In case the alleged kidnapped girl appears to be minor or if she is major but supports the prosecution version, it shall be opened to the police authority to arrest the petitioners. In case the petitioners approach the S.P./S.S.P. concerned to provide the security for the above mentioned purpose, the same shall be provided to them.
It is further directed that issue of custody of the alleged kidnapped girl shall also be decided by the CJM concerned in accordance with law.
With the above direction this petition is finally disposed of.
(Krishna Pratap Singh, J.) (Ramesh Sinha, J.) Order Date :- 30.3.2018/NS
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Munish And Others vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 March, 2018
Judges
  • Ramesh Sinha
Advocates
  • Arvind Kumar