IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.N.SATYANARAYANA WRIT PETITION NO.9094 OF 2012 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN:
MUNI REDDY SINCE DECEASED REP BY HIS LRS (a). N. LAKSHMINARASIMHA REDDY S/O MUNI REEDY AGED 57 YEARS (b). RAMACHANADRA REEDY S/O MUNI REEDY AGED 52 YEARS (C) SMT. RADHA W/O LATE NARASIMHA REDDY AGED 42 YEARS (d) BHUVAN REEDY S/O LATE NARASIMHA REEDY AGED 21 YEARS (e) M. NAGARAJA REDDY S/O MUNI REDDY AGED 40 YEARS ALL ARE RESIDING AT MANTAPPA VILLAGE JIGANI HOBLI ANEKAL TALUK BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT. (BY SRI. B RAMESH, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE VIDHANA SOUDHA DR.B R AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE -560001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DISTRICT BANGALORE-560 001.
3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BANGALORE SOUTH SUB DIVISION MYSORE BANK CIRCLE BANGALORE 560 009.
4. THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR TALUK OFFICE COMPOUND ANEKAL TALUK BANGALORE DISTRICT.
5. SMT. SHIVARUDURAMMA W/O KAPPANNA R/A. MANTAPA VILLAGE JIGANI HOBLI ANEKAL TALUK BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT.
6. M. SHOBHA W/O DR. GOVINDARAJ AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS R/AT 658, 6TH ‘C’ MAIN ROAD 11TH CROSS, 3RD PHASE, J.P.NAGAR ... PETITIONERS BANGALORE -560078.
... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. T. S. MAHANTESH, AGA FOR R-1 TO R-4.
R-5 SERVED BUT UNREPRESENTED, V/O DATED 12/12/12, NOTICE TO R-6 IS HELD SUFFICIENT) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 04.05.2009 PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT ON THE FILE OF REVN. PETN. NO.68/2007-08 WHICH IS PRODUCED AND MARKED AS ANNEXURE-M AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING.
O R D E R The petitioners herein are challenging the order of the 2nd respondent - Deputy Commissioner in Revision Petition No.68/2007-8 dated 04.05.2009, vide Annexure- M, confirming the order of the 3rd respondent - Assistant Commissioner in Proceedings No.RA(A)No.52/1997-98 dated 29.04.1999, vide Annexure-K.
2. Admittedly, the dispute is with reference to revenue entries to an extent of 35 guntas in Sy.No.16 of Mantapa Village, Jigani Hobli, Anekal Taluk, Bangalore Urban District. The petitioners would submit that the total extent of the said survey number is 5 acres 31 guntas. If the survey is conducted, he would be in a position to establish his extent in the said land and thereafter, he intends to approach the authorities for making such entries. With such observations, he seeks to withdraw the Writ Petition.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- JUDGE Prs*