Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Mumthaj Begam vs A.Mohamed Jameel

Madras High Court|13 February, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that the suit property has been sold by the respondent in favour of the appellant's son-in-law and the second appeal may be dismissed as settled out of Court. He has made an endorsement to the following effect:
"Since the respondent herein has executed a deed of sale in favour of the appellant's son-in-law pursuant to an understanding between the appellant and the respondent, this S.A. is not pressed. It is prayed that the S.A. may be dismissed as settled out of Court."
2.In view of the above endorsement made by the learned counsel for the appellant, the second appeal is dismissed as settled out of Court. No costs. consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
13.02.2017 Index:Yes/No mmi To
1.The Additional District Court, Nagapattinam.
2.The Principal Subordinate Court, Nagapattinam.
M.M.SUNDRESH, J.
mmi S.A.No.551 of 2000 13.02.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Mumthaj Begam vs A.Mohamed Jameel

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
13 February, 2017