Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Mumtaz vs State Of U.P.Thru.Secy.Home & ...

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|27 August, 2019

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Hon'ble Narendra Kumar Johari,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned A.G.A.
This petition has been filed for commanding the opposite parties not to harass the petitioner in pursuance of the first information report in case crime No.0267 of 2019, under Sections-419, 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC, Police Station- Gangahat, District Unnao.
Learned A.G.A. has informed that the petitioner has an efficacious and alternative remedy under Section-438 Cr.P.C. wherein the petitioner ought to have moved an application for anticipatory bail before appropriate Court. However, counsel for the petitioner says that he will require a little time to avail the remedy.
Accordingly, ten days' time from today is allowed to the petitioner for approaching court concerned and availing the remedy. Till the said period of ten days, the petitioner shall not be arrested in aforesaid case crime.
Subject to above, the petition stands dismissed.
Order Date :- 27.8.2019 RKM.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Mumtaz vs State Of U.P.Thru.Secy.Home & ...

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
27 August, 2019
Judges
  • Shabihul Hasnain
  • Narendra Kumar Johari