Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Mumtaz vs State Of Up And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|28 February, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 5
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 8095 of 2018 Petitioner :- Mumtaz Respondent :- State Of Up And 9 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Amresh Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Pankaj Naqvi,J.
Heard Sri Amresh Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Abhishek Shukla, the learned Standing Counsel.
Considering that petitioner already has an order of status quo, which equally binds private respondents in respect of their possession as lessees, if order is breached, remedy lies before a competent forum, subject to advise.
There is no good ground to entertain the writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
The writ petition is dismissed as not maintainable.
Order Date :- 28.2.2018 N.S.Rathour
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Mumtaz vs State Of Up And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
28 February, 2018
Judges
  • Pankaj Naqvi
Advocates
  • Amresh Tripathi