Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Mukhiya vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|20 December, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 49
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 46649 of 2018 Applicant :- Mukhiya Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Pandey Balkrishna Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned A.G.A.
This application is filed by the applicant for quashing order of N.B.W. dated 25.08.2017 including entire proceeding of S.T. No.977 of 2011 (State Vs. Madhav Singh and others) Case Crime No.97 of 2011, under Sections 328, 363, 366, 376, 120B IPC, P.S. Kagraul, District Agra, pending in the court of Additional District Judge, (F.T.C.), Agra.
After arguing at some length, learned counsel for applicant submits that grievance of applicant would be sufficiently met in case bail application of applicants is considered expeditiously in accordance with law.
In view thereof, it is provided that if the applicant surrenders before the Court below within three weeks from today and applies for bail, the Court below will consider the same, in accordance with law in view of the observations made in the case of Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P. reported in [2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC)].
For a period of three weeks, no coercive steps shall be taken against the applicant.
With the aforesaid, the application is disposed of.
Order Date :- 20.12.2018 Radhika (Vivek Chaudhary,J.)
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Mukhiya vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
20 December, 2018
Judges
  • Vivek Chaudhary
Advocates
  • Pandey Balkrishna