Court No. - 88
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 2152 of 2021 Revisionist :- Mukesh And 4 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.And Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Dwijendra Prasad Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Somdev Dixit
Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J.
Heard Sri Dwijendra Prasad, learned counsel for the revisionists, learned A.G.A. for the State as well as Sri Somdev Dixit, learned Counsel for opposite party no .2 and perused the record.
The present revision has been preferred seeking quashing the impugned order dated 6.2.2021 passed by Addl. Sessions Judge, Court no.8 in Sessions Trial No.44 of 2019 under Section 304B, 498A IPC and 3/4 D.P. Act, P.S. Basai Mohammadpur, District Firozabad by which application filed by the informant/complainant under Section 319 Cr.P.C. was allowed and revisionists were summoned to face trial.
The contention of counsel for the revisionists is that the revisionists are near relative of husband and as such they have been falsely implicated in this case. The Investigating Officer after due investigating had submitted charge-sheet against husband, father-in-law and mother-in-law and the revisionists were exonerated.
After arguing the case for quite some time at length, learned counsel for the revisionists himself has given up to address the Court on merits of the case and prayed, that the purpose of his clients would suffice, if a direction may be given to the courts below to decide their bail application within specific time frame.
However, it is directed, that in case revisionists appear and surrender before the court below within 30 days from today and applies for bail the court below shall consider and decide the bail prayer of revisionists expeditiously in accordance with law.
With the above directions, present revision is disposed off. Order Date :- 28.9.2021 S. Singh